Residents of Arizona have developed a variety of opinions and assumptions about Prop 102, the proposition that aims to clearly define the word “marriage” in the state of Arizona. It seems that for as many people as you ask about Prop 102 you’ll find a different perception of it.
While proponents of Prop 102 encourage every individual to uphold and honor their own beliefs in regards to this proposition, there seems to be much confusion associated with the intentions of Prop 102. With this in mind, it is recommended that every person develop their own opinion based on the actual facts before casting a vote in November.
Simply put; Prop 102 seeks to clearly define marriage in the state of Arizona as the union of one woman and one man. Prop 102 is not proposed to deny the rights or benefits of any individual, persons or group. Unfortunately, the purpose of the proposition has been the cause of much confusion for many. It should be pointed out that by seeking to clearly defining “marriage” as the union of one man to one woman; it does not imply that Prop 102 has any latent messages or intentions to limit rights. The proposition has nothing to with denying rights.
Prop 102 only aims at passing an absolute definition of the word “marriage,” any other purpose or intention assigned to the proposition is done at the error of the assigner. Prop 102 is only 20 words long and strictly regards the definition of marriage? nothing more.
Prop 102 reads as follows: “Only the union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.” Prop 102 appears on the ballot this November for the sole purpose of maintaining the traditional definition of marriage and in no way seeks to restrict the rights of any individuals.
Another misunderstanding surrounding Prop 102 is the belief or concern that it is the same as Prop 107 which did not pass in 2006. While Prop 102 and Prop 107 are similar to each other, there are some very notable differences. Prop 107 includes the following; “No legal status for unmarried persons shall be created or recognized by this state or its political subdivisions that is similar to that of marriage.” The opposition of the proposition viewed this to be an attack on the domestic partner benefits of unwed individuals. Prop 102 contains no such confusion. It only seeks to define marriage as the union of one man to one woman and has no connection to domestic partner benefits.
Contrary to the beliefs of many people, the supporters of Prop 102 include individuals from all cultures, religions and political sides. The idea is current that the proponents of Prop 102 are limited to conservative groups and religious enthusiasts, but the fact is advocates of the proposition can be found just about anywhere.
It’s tempting to pigeon hole Prop 102. But the fact is this proposition is not an issue of conservative vs. liberal or one party vs. another, it’s about maintaining the traditional definition of marriage; The union of one man and one woman. Prop 102; simple and clear.
Tagged with: Marriage
Filed under: Marriage
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
